Veebeam HD – Wireless HDMI From your PC to TV


In the past year, we’ve seen a number of different wireless streaming devices intended to help bridge the gap between the distance between users and the television. Unlike recent products like the Boxee Box and GoogleTV, which are intended to connect directly to your television full-time, wireless USB streaming devices such as the Veebeam HD try a different route opting to leverage your existing computer from anywhere in the room to stream content to the big screen. This is a great product in theory but can it mesh with how users currently use and expect their home theater PCs to behave?


Since a lot of what I’m speaking about is easier to understand visually, I have prepared a short 6-minute video covering some of the activity from this review.


Before we breakdown the intended usage, let’s take a look at the specs according to Veebeam’s website.

Video/Audio/USB output Composite A/V
Digital Audio/TOSLink
Two (2) USB Ports
Screen/input resolution 1280 x 1024 – Desktop
1280 x 1024 – Photo, Video
Max output resolution 480i – NTSC/PAL
1080p – HDMI
A/V containers If you can play it on your PC, you can play it on Veebeam.
Capable of supporting: AVI, MKV (Matroska), MOV/M4V (Quicktime), MP4, ASF/WMV (Microsoft), MPG (MPEG2-PS/TS), Flash, AVCHD.
Video decoders If you can play it on your PC, you can play it on Veebeam.
Capable of supporting: H.264/AVC, MPEG4 (part 2)/Xvid, WMV (VC-1), MPEG-2 , VP6/7/8, Theora
Audio decoders If you can play it on your PC, you can play it on Veebeam.
MP3 (MPEG1 Layer 3), AAC, AAC+, Dolby Digital/AC-3 (downmix), LPCM (AIFF, WAV), WMA, DTS (downmix), FLAC
Photo formats Screencast | JPEG, BMP, GIF, TIFF
Power 110-120VAC (60Hz) or 220-240VAC (50Hz) 10W at 12VDC (20W max)
Wireless Ultra-Wideband @>150Mbps constant rate
DRM None
Systems requirements 2.2 GHz or greater Intel Core 2 Duo or Intel i3, i5, and i7
2 MB cache memory
Mac OS X (10.5, 10.6), Windows 7 and Windows Vista
Protocols Used DLNA, UPnP and Wireless USB Compatible
Footprint 120mm x 120mm x 80mm
Warranty Details

I bolded specifically “If it plays on your PC, it plays on Veebeam” as it will become a major sticking point later in the review. Furthermore, note the fairly hefty system requirements–not necessarily cutting edge, but considering one could throw together a very low powered but video accelerated system to power everything, it is something to keep in mind.

I did a bit of research in order to uncover some further details about the HDMI spec which is supported:

The Veebeam HDMI port supports HDMI v1.2 (with select support for some v1.3 features). The audio supported on the HDMI is:

– 2 channels
– 32KHz, 44.1KHz or 48KHz
– 16, 20 or 24 bit

Therefore, be aware that you will automatically be sacrificing surround sound, which severely limits the potential of using the Veebeam HD as a full-time home theater setup–I don’t believe this was their intention, but again worth noting.

And last but not least is the price tag. Although there are often promotions, at the time of publication the MSRP of the Veebeam HD is $139 plus shipping. When placed next to the $300 GoogleTV box, this is a very attractive point; however when compared to the sub-$100 Roku and AppleTV devices, things get much trickier.


Arriving in a fairly discreet brown box with the Veebeam logo on it, the unit comes with everything you would need (pictured below): Quickstart guide, power adapter, Veebeam HD receiver unit, USB dongle, HDMI and composite RCA cables. One thing to note, the HDMI cable is fairly rugged and thick, with an orange braiding on it. While I can’t technically comment on the diefference in quality, it’s suffice to say that it is more expensive than most generic HDMI cables included with hardware, and a welcome sight when opening the package.

Veebeam Box
On the rear of the unit you have your standard audio and video connections–optical S/PDIF, composite video and audio, HDMI and two USB ports. Why two USB ports you might ask? For now they are solely used for pairing new USB dongles, but Veebeam has hinted that in the future they may be enabled to support external storage devices.


The setup is remarkably simple as you might expect. There are really just two components to the Veebeam HD set–the receiver and the USB dongle. The receiver is an oddly shaped box which connects to an outlet, and then you can connect to your television via HDMI or other supported connection. The USB dongle connects to a Windows or Mac system and then communicates via Wireless USB to broadcast the signal from the system to the TV without any cables. Please note however that this does limit the range of the device to approximately 20’ depending on your environment.
Once the receiver is connected to a TV, all you will need to do is install the Veebeam software and the USB dongle will be detected automatically by the base unit. Something to remember on setup, the USB dongle is somewhat wide and may interfere with existing USB ports depending the amount of space available.

The slot in the front of the Veebeam HD is for the dongle to reside when not in use. There’s no charging necessary as it’s powered via USB, but it is a convenient location for you not to lose the dongle. The unit detects whether the dongle is inserted using a  light signal–when the dongle is inserted and blocks the light, the unit powers off.  Also note, that when you have the dongle back in the cradle it powers down the unit to a standby power draw of 0 watts. This instant-on feature is great to see. The wattage draw with the unit ON ranged from 4.5-4.9 watts, a more than acceptable number given that your TV’s standby mode probably draws more power. Here’s the breakdown of all power testing:

  Veebeam HD  
Powered Off (Dongle in Cradle) 0 watts  
Power On (Not playing/screencasting) 4.3 watts  
Playing Video File via Veebeam Player 5.0 watts  
Screencast mode 4.7 watts  

You will notice the odd shape and size of the receiver from the pictures. The unit is passively cooled, so there may be some airflow purposes to the design, or possibly similar to the Boxee Box the folks at Veebeam wanted to attract some attention, which it succeeds with–for better or worse. I would have loved the unit to be as small as possible in order to be tucked away out of site, but that’s just my personal preference.

In reviewing items like this, it’s important to understand how it all works. To help in doing so, let’s take a look at the innards of the Veebeam HD to see what’s powering this little guy, and more so, if there’s a purpose for the odd shape and design.

Opening the Veebeam HD receiver was not easy as the small screws were on there tight, but we were not discouraged. Once we cracked it open, one can see there’s really not much inside as there’s a lot of space. While I’m sure part of this is due to providing some extra room for airflow, judging that there’s not a heatsink on the chips, I would assume that this was not a concern and made solely for design/appearance. Again, if you love the design, this is a good thing, but if you prefer to have these types of devices tucked away or mounted somewhere, you’re out of luck. Design and space aside, you can see the wireless USB mini-PCI adapter connected, and then the connections for the backpanel I/O ports. It’s all neat, tidy and rather simple.

The biggest chip on the board is also the most important–STMicroelectronics, STI7105-IUC–which is a low cost HD decoder. Per its specifications page, this is capable of the following:

  1. Advanced high definition video decoding (H264/VC-1/MPEG2)
  2. Advanced standard definition video decoding (H264/VC-1/MPEG2/AVS)
  3. Advanced multi-channel audio decoding (MPEG 1, 2, MP3, DD/DD+, AAC/AAC+, WMA9/WMA9pro)
  4. Linux, Windows CE and OS21 compatible ST40 applications CPU (450 MHz)
  5. 32-bit DDR1/DDR2 compatible local memory interface
  6. Multi-stream, DVR capable transport stream processing
  7. Extensive connectivity (dual USB hosts, e-SATA, ethernet MAC/MII/RMII, MPX, and PCI)
  8. Advance security and DRM support including SVP, MS-DRM and DTCP-IP
  9. DVD data decryption


Not too shabby features for the chipset, especially when you consider that it’s doing the work 100% passively cooled without even a heatsink. You’ll notice no support for HD audio streams, which we will expand further upon in our testing.


There are two methods of using the Veebeam HD device–one is called Screencasting and the other is the Veebeam player–each has its benefits and disadvantages. First, the Screencasting mode, which is essentially clone mode for those familiar with dual monitors; whatever you see on your computer screen is displayed identically on the television. This is both a good and bad thing. It’s good in in the sense that it’s very easy to understand how it works, but bad in that it renders your computer essentially as an HTPC and you are unable to use it for other tasks unless you want them shown on screen. The other issue with this feature is a 3 second delay from when something occurs on your system to when it’s shown on your TV–this might not seem like a big deal but since the Veebeam HD is using your system’s controller (it does not include a remote) and makes controlling it very difficult–not to mention that the mouse cursor does not extend to the cloned TV making it virtually impossible to control solely by viewing the TV. Resolution wise, Veebeam HD mimics whatever resolution your computer is set to–there is absolutely no scaling done, so if you are connecting to a 1080p TV but have your system at 1024×768, be prepared for some black vertical bars on the sides. Note also, that the software is limited to 30 frames per second, so the picture will not be as sharp as with 720p60 or 1080p60 which are 60fps. This was noticeable and made text rather hard to discern.


I wish I could say that that was the extent of my issues with Screencasting mode of the Veebeam HD, but videophiles will not be pleased. I tested the unit on three platforms: the Intel Clarkdale Core-i5 system with 3.33Ghz CPU and 4gb of DDR3 memory and Windows 7 x64, a Macbook 2.26 Core 2 Duo with 4gb DDR3 memory and OSX 10.6.4, and then an ASUS whitebook laptop with a 2.0 Core 2 Duo and 4gb of DDR2 memory. Only that last ASUS is below the minimum system requirements, but my experiences were identical across all platforms and operating systems. During many of the tests, I paid close attention to the CPU usage, and honestly rarely saw a spike in performance to even hint that the issues were (or could be) hardware based–the Intel system for example, while streaming 1080p video content, only utilized approximately 5-10% CPU, peaking out at 22%.

Veebeam markets the device as “If it plays on your PC, it can play on your TV.” My problem with a marketing slogan like that is, your average consumer won’t read the specific filetypes supported list. So if Consumer Joe pops in a Blu-ray in his laptop and loads it up to the Veebeam, how disappointed do you think they would be when it won’t play on his TV? Or how about the user who thinks it would be a great idea to use Windows Media Center, only to find that when you launch it full screen in Screencasting mode, the Veebeam HD loses connection. Either of these are understandable given the complexities of HDMI and copy protection schemes (which hopefully Veebeam can resolve at least the MCE issue), but the biggest problem I had was just with overall playback.

When Screencasting at both 1080p and 720p resolutions I experienced a consistent judder of the image no matter the content–from 1080p video to lower quality YouTube streams. Not a significant amount as the video was still viewable, but anyone with a very large screen and attention to detail would not be satisfied. I was told this experience is not normal, however after testing 3 different systems I’m not so sure. I also experienced some scan lines during certain higher quality videos (basically a horizontal line across the middle of the screen)–I have not seen this since the original Intel DG45ID platform’s original drivers which had many HDMI issues initially, but eventually this was resolved via driver updates. I’m hoping Veebeam will be able to resolve these as well and will update when and if that time comes.

I am pleased to say that the Veebeam player experience is significantly better all around. The limitations on playback are much greater however and very much depends on the codecs installed on your system to playback. The player is a small window where you can drag individual files or folders to. Once inserted, you will see a timer depending on your system hardware, then  the file is processed and later the Player decides if it is capable of playing the file or not. The benefit of this mode is that you are able to playback video files and minimize the player and still be able to use the system for any other activity, without interrupting playback. Also, unlike Screencasting mode, I did not experience any issue with stutter, judder or scan lines during playback of supported filetypes. The playlist mode is very simple as it plays files in the order they are listed. As expected, the number of filetypes supported with the player is more limited than in Screencasting mode as the player does need to process the file using the codecs on your system. The main disadvantage of using the Player mode versus the Screencasting is that you cannot play web-enabled video sources such as YouTube.

Please be prepared in both options however, if you have any video files with surround sound audio, the Veebeam HD will not process the surround sound, but it did in most cases convert down to two channel audio at least. To give you a better idea of the breadth of formats able to be handled by both Screencasting and Veebeam Player modes, I tested a wealth of media files and have prepared this little chart to help you understand what is and is not supported:

  Screencasting Veebeam Player
Arcsoft (any content) X X
Windows 7 Media Center (Full Screen) X X
XVid/Divx Y Y
1080p MKV (VC-1/PCM 2 channel) Y Y
1080p WMV-HD (VC1/WMA3 2ch) Y Y
1080p MOV (AVC/AAC 2 channel) Y Y
1080p MP4 (AVC/AAC 2 ch) Y No Audio
1080p MP4 (AVC/AAC) Y Y
1080p M2TS (VC1/AC3) X X
1080p WMV-HD (WMV3/WMA3 6ch) Y* Y*
WTV No Audio X
DVR-MS No Audio X
720p MKV (H.264 AVC/DTS 6ch) Y* Y*
1080p MKV (H.264 AVC/DTS-MA 6ch) Stutters Pixelated Video
720p MKV (H.264 AVC/AC-3 6ch) Y* Y*
720p AVI (Xvid/AC-3 6ch) Y* Y*
720p MP4 (AVC/AAC 6ch) Y* No Audio
720p MKV (WMV AVC/AC-3 2ch) Y Y

*Note in all the above tests, only 2 channel PCM audio was passed through the Veebeam to the Onkyo AVR

The last note for usage testing of the Veebeam HD was with the range of the Wireless USB which was rather impressive. According to the Wireless USB FAQ it should support 33 feet of distance. Unfortunately my apartment prevents me from testing such distances, but I was able to go approximately 20 feet without any issues. This was pretty good as it would allow you to use a system in another room to transmit to your television, with one condition–no doors! As soon as I closed the door the signal was instantly cut. A bit of a disappointment, but if you have to have this setup you could probably live with this solution as opposed to running a long HDMI cable.


One question you might be asking is: Why would I want the Veebeam HD instead of something like an AppleTV or Roku device? I’m afraid the answer is not a simple one as it completely depends on what your needs and expectations are. For version 1, it does an admirable job at what it’s attempting. If you often have the need to play YouTube or other browser-based videos–say from Hulu–on your television, then the Veebeam HD is a good alternative to a dedicated HTPC or GoogleTV system. However, if you utilize just a number of web sources or strictly locally stored videos then the benefit over devices like a Roku/AppleTV is much less.

The control issue is I think what hurts the Veebeam HD more than anything–without an included remote control or pointer device, and with the mouse being invisible on the television, it literally forces you to HAVE to use the laptop or system even if you only wanted to extend it. And with so many laptops today now including an HDMI port, some may prefer to just connect a long HDMI cable to it and then not be constrained by the limitations of the Veebeam HD.

I love the idea of the Veebeam HD, I really do. But until they can expand their overall support of filetypes (remember they advertise “if it plays on your PC it can play on Veebeam”), and leverage the power of your system such as utilizing “extend desktop” mode where you could still have the use of your laptop while viewing web videos, then its available uses are fairly small and make justifying the $140 price tag difficult.


  • Wireless USB is more than capapble of 1080p
  • Good range
  • No internet content can be blocked (such as Hulu on GoogleTV)


  • Costs more than Roku/AppleTV extender devices
  • No extend desktop mode
  • Some filetype/application limitations
  • Video quality issues in Screencast mode
  • Down-converts surround sound into 2-channel LPCM

Thanks to Veebeam for providing the review unit.

  • Its funny.  I put a lot of

    Its funny.  I put a lot of effort into minimizing the amount of wireless devices I use.  Even this weekend I helped a friend hardware some Cat6 drops to replace his wireless devices.  But every time I see a wireless-HDMI device all I can think is “I want one!” even though I have almost no use for it. 

  • Greetings from Veebeam

    Greetings from Veebeam central.  We always like people reviewing and comparing our stuff; so, great job on such a detailed review.

    I do have a few things to point out, that you may or may not already know.  We are constantly improving and refining our software and periodically release updates.

    – Roku HD and AppleTV are designed for content services and only support 720p.

    – We’re trying to create the simplest software setup possible; something you have noted.  We hope users find this appealing compared to traditional WiFi type setup.

    – WirelessUSB is a high-speed technology that doesn’t suffer interference in the same way as 2.4GHz radio devices.  This is critical in getting good wireless video.

    – Most file compatibility issues can be resolved by installing DirectShow Filter codecs.  Certainly files you’ve had issues with, I know we can play.

    – Technical support here is quite friendly.  If you contact them they can either guide you to a solution, or take your files, analyse them.  We’ll then include support in our next release.

    We’re keen to constantly improve our software and learn from our users experiences.  If you have issues, please get in contact with us; we’re more than happy to help.


    • Hi ninja- Welcome to Missing

      Hi ninja- Welcome to Missing Remote.

      Great to see Veebeam represent themselves and look for feedback.  That alone increases my likelihood in purchasing from a company.

      Btw, Roku released a firmware update yesterday adding 1080p support.

      • Oh Roku, aren’t you sneaky. 

        Oh Roku, aren’t you sneaky.  Their website still says the Roku HD doesn’t support 1080p;

        But to be honest, I don’t consider Roku to be a competitor, we do different things.  Lots of people find their PCs lack HDMI, audio over HDMI, DisplayPort compatibility with their TV etc.

        We’re all about using your ultra web-compatible, codec compatible, zippy PC you spend hard mula on in new ways.

        So I’m more than happy to play in the same sandpit.

  • Hey Ninja, I mention it in my

    Hey Ninja, I mention it in my article but maybe you can comment–are there any plans to leverage “Extended” desktop mode in future software revisions? I’m assuming the functionality is already built into laptop display drivers anyways, and it would make it much more useful IMO.

    Just curious, thanks 🙂

    • Hi Mike,
      There are two

      Hi Mike,

      There are two mechanisms built into the Windows display architecture that show up as either a mirrored or an extended view of your desktop.

      Early on we realised that mirrored mode at the driver level suffered performance issues and that extended mode is confusing for novice users (i.e. they forget which desktop a window is on).  We consider simplicity in conveying a complex technology to a broad range of users paramount.

      Coupled with how we grab and transmit the desktop using screencasting we decided to go the way we did.  If we did want to extend the user desktop we’d actually need to write a whole new display driver and submit for approval to Microsoft and Apple.

      The critical parts of our screencasting technology are how we capture the desktop, sychnronise the audio and play that back on the Veebeam receiver at the correct frame-rates for your varied streamed video sources.  This isn’t even close to as simple as you may think.

      I do understand what you’re asking for, i.e. more flexibility to work on one display and use the TV independently.  We consider the Veebeam Player mode important to achieving this, and we will be constantly enhancing and improving what can be done with this.

      For now though, we’re working hard to make sure all internet streamed content plays well, improve capabilities and add features.  We offer free firmware and software updates for Veebeam and hope to improve all sorts of things based on feedback of our users as we continue to develop our product.

      I hope that answers and gives some insight in what we’re doing.

      — Ninja.

  • Appreciate the response

    Appreciate the response Ninja, definitely clarifies the complexity. I agree the Veebeam Player is the key selling point to the Veebeam HD, it’s very slick. I look forward to see changes in the future.

  • Hi Mike
    We have a very

    Hi Mike

    We have a very samiliar product called EZview+ (

    based on the same technology which I think outperforns Veebeam product.

    Ezview+ can be used in extend mode, present your mouse , and work with any media player.

    • George L. Schmauch Jr.

      We’d be happy to review your

      We’d be happy to review your product, if you’d care to send one over.  Contact Mike Garcen (mike at missingremote dot com) if you’re interested.

      Also, your “details” page for the EZView isn’t entirely in English, specifically the technical specs.  I did notice what looks to be a claim of surround sound, though, which would be something the Veebeam was missing at the time of this review.