SikSlayer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28381

    [quote=”swoon”]
    Here’s another review posted by newfiend at TGB: http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gt-430-review/1

    AMD’s open-source 3D initiative seems pretty interesting and seems noteworthy that they will support their 5xxx and perhaps even some 4xxx cards.
    [/quote]

    Nvidia’s 3D support is 2 years old, if not more, so just about any nvidia card you’d wanna buy can do it now. Its nice being able to demo 3D with red/blue ‘glasses’ in lieu of 3DTV support from 3DTV Play for those of us who aren’t gonna buy a 3DTV for a long ass time.

    in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1523

    [quote=”swoon”]
    Here’s another review posted by newfiend at TGB: http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-gt-430-review/1

    AMD’s open-source 3D initiative seems pretty interesting and seems noteworthy that they will support their 5xxx and perhaps even some 4xxx cards.
    [/quote]

    Nvidia’s 3D support is 2 years old, if not more, so just about any nvidia card you’d wanna buy can do it now. Its nice being able to demo 3D with red/blue ‘glasses’ in lieu of 3DTV support from 3DTV Play for those of us who aren’t gonna buy a 3DTV for a long ass time.

    in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1518

    [quote=”Mikinho”]That is why I said “first HTPC-centric consumer”.  The GTX 460 and 450 already offer it but neither is very HTPC friendly w/ the higher power consumption.  The GT 420 also offers it but it is an OEM only card.
    [/quote]

    Ahh, gotcha. Big difference.

    in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28376

    [quote=”Mikinho”]That is why I said “first HTPC-centric consumer”.  The GTX 460 and 450 already offer it but neither is very HTPC friendly w/ the higher power consumption.  The GT 420 also offers it but it is an OEM only card.
    [/quote]

    Ahh, gotcha. Big difference.

    in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1515

    Wait a sec, this isn’t the first card to do this from Nvidia, that would have been the GTX 460. This card, however, is a better physical fit for an HTPC.

    in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28373

    Wait a sec, this isn’t the first card to do this from Nvidia, that would have been the GTX 460. This card, however, is a better physical fit for an HTPC.

    in reply to: Re: Daily Frustrations when being a HTPC enthusiast #1464

    [quote=”autoboy”]SageTV can be very stable if you can just quit fiddling with it.[/quote]

    The same can be said of any HTPC app.

    in reply to: Daily Frustrations when being a HTPC enthusiast #28322

    [quote=”autoboy”]SageTV can be very stable if you can just quit fiddling with it.[/quote]

    The same can be said of any HTPC app.

    in reply to: Re: Daily Frustrations when being a HTPC enthusiast #1455

    That sounds very likely, but you’d think if that was the case, then more people would have the same issue. the HDHR is a popular device, there’s gotta be more than one Ceton owner who also has an HDHR. Oddly enough, there’s likely a large number of those who got rid of/removed the HDHR when they got the Ceton.

    in reply to: Daily Frustrations when being a HTPC enthusiast #28313

    That sounds very likely, but you’d think if that was the case, then more people would have the same issue. the HDHR is a popular device, there’s gotta be more than one Ceton owner who also has an HDHR. Oddly enough, there’s likely a large number of those who got rid of/removed the HDHR when they got the Ceton.

    in reply to: Re: Primary HTPC Software Results and New Poll! #1375

    I came back to this thread after how many hours its been since I posted, and so its been on my mind what I said, and just I want to say I don’t think the poll was biased in any way, or was it intended to get a certain outcome. All I’m saying is that a good number of Sage users come to this site, as its one of the few that I know of that continually posts Sage-related news.

    On the contrary, if this poll was on Engadget, it’d be much different. I’d say XBMC/Plex/Boxee would do much better, probably than 7MC.

    In all, I think I could have used better words to get across my meaning. I’m not trying to imply any intended bias.

    in reply to: Primary HTPC Software Results and New Poll! #28233

    I came back to this thread after how many hours its been since I posted, and so its been on my mind what I said, and just I want to say I don’t think the poll was biased in any way, or was it intended to get a certain outcome. All I’m saying is that a good number of Sage users come to this site, as its one of the few that I know of that continually posts Sage-related news.

    On the contrary, if this poll was on Engadget, it’d be much different. I’d say XBMC/Plex/Boxee would do much better, probably than 7MC.

    In all, I think I could have used better words to get across my meaning. I’m not trying to imply any intended bias.

    in reply to: Primary HTPC Software Results and New Poll! #28227

    This is a Sage-centric site in many ways, and I think that the poll would have turned out differently on another site.

    in reply to: Re: Primary HTPC Software Results and New Poll! #1369

    This is a Sage-centric site in many ways, and I think that the poll would have turned out differently on another site.

    in reply to: NVIDIA Joins the HD Audio Bitstreaming Club #27907

    [quote=”flips”]
    wow.  the cheapest GTX 460 on newegg is $170.  That’s a hard sell compared to a $50 HD5XXX card.
    [/quote]

    Or the the integrated GPU in the Clarksdale i3.

    But the use for an HTPC with a card with the power of a GTX 460 is for gaming. An i3, combined with a 460 or similar card, would do very well with most current PC games, even Crysis. Most these newer non-Atom HTPC machines would be fine for gaming if they just had a proper GPU.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)