Are you going to update your HTPC to Windows 8?

Mar 01 2012
I am not waiting until RTM, I am already upgraded
5% (15 votes)
I will move at RTM date (whenever that is)
16% (44 votes)
Maybe between 6 months to a year after RTM, just incase
14% (38 votes)
What is this Windows OS you are talking about?
1% (2 votes)
Windows 7 will still be King with me...
17% (48 votes)
I am never leaving Windows Vista, the best OS ever
0% (0 votes)
I like Windows XP, gives me the complete eXPerience
0% (1 vote)
Linux For The Win!
5% (14 votes)
Not on my Mac!
1% (3 votes)
It's too early to tell, let me play with it first
41% (113 votes)
Total votes: 278

Comments

I was actually looking for the "Windows 9" option, but figured the Windows 7 one was about the same response.

From what we know now, there is nothing there for us Media Center people...

If Media Center is eventually refactored as Metro apps and the new Metro shell (and apps) made remote friendly, then there might be reason...

I haven't had a chance to play with the MCE functions of it yet(if anything is actually different), but I don't feel any compelling reason to upgrade just off the basic Win8 stuff.  Outside of it being okay for a tablet, nothing about Win8 really makes me want to switch to it on any of my machines.

I voted "too early to tell" because as RehabMan said, we don't even know if there will be any enchancements of media center. But at the moment, I can think of various hardware upgrades I would prefer to paying for a win8 license.

Being a SageTV user,  I may have a need to move to a different Media Center program at an undetermined time in the future.  That is when I would most likely consider going to Windows 8 and switching to WMC.

 

However, that doesn't preclude setting up Win8 on a test machine or looking into a Win8 tablet (when available)

 

There are a couple people claiming MC is a bit snappier on W8 so that might be reason enough to give it a go.  Even though MC is unchanged, it is riding atop a new OS so while it may not look different it has potential to behave differently...perhaps?

I'll probably build a new HTPC with Win8 and a new mobo in my present chassis, bring over my tuners, and migrate slowly as I finish watching the copy-protected recordings made with my now naked Win7 HTPC mobo. Even so, ultimately taking my Win7 machine out of service will be a wrench since I have many 'keepers' recorded which are protected with DRM. Not least a complete set of my daughter's House of Anubis on my WHS.

What I'd really like is an upgrade path which allows me to move all my recordings to my WHS, archive the DRM information, perform a clean install of Win8 on a new machine, and then import the Win7 DRM information so that I can watch the Win7 HTPC recordings on my WHS. I know that will never happen as it is a means to break the DRM and theoretically play back the recordings on as many machines as I like, unless MSFT augment the DRM solution to include a phone-home one-copy authorization.

Frank.

If MC is snappier, I might upgrade sooner. 

However, any fresh OS installation is snappier than a 6 months old installation. Maybe that's why they believe it's snappier...

I can't help but think the same thing but I hope those who claim it's snappier have the wisdom to know the difference. 

I've never understood this.  Unless people install tons of garbage on their systems, an older install should not be noticeably slower.  I recall people telling me that they reinstalled Windows every 9-12 months or so.  Even back then, I told them they were crazy.  I've never done anything like that.  I reinstall when I'm upgrading Windows or there's a hardware failure I can't recover from (although, with current backup software, this is pretty much a thing of the past).

Well, in my day-job I have to install test builds of Windows onto a variety of systems. And no, I don't work for MSFT but I have access to many incremental builds. Some of those target systems are clones of relatively simple or relatively busy 'real life' Win 7 systems with a mish-mash of common and uncommon applications. I can assure the poster that yes, with a great deal of tweaking and knowledge of what is happening under the skin I could perhaps achieve an upgraded performance similar if not identical to a clean install. That would take many hours and knowledge that I don't have. Without intimate knowledge of every application I don't think anyone could. Plus, there would still be remnants hanging around on the mass storage that might confuse further application installs if the installers check for now irrelevant files. Bottom line is that is just faster, easier, and ultimately more reliable to go for a clean install if you are able to since that will give you a system which is both faster and less prone to future issues.

Obviously I voted Linux for the win.  However, I have a couple of Win7 based laptops and I have no intention of upgrading those to Win8 either.  I am not a fan of the Metro interface.  Maybe I'll warm up to the idea in a year or two but until then...  Besides, why upgrade if everything is running stably?  Isn't that why there are a whole bunch of PCs still on XP?

Definitely can't wait for XBMC 11 and Win8 - I think finally the HTPC has grown up.

As nice as Win7 is, it's just not made for large screens and for simple remote commands to access your bits and pieces.

 

 

Great results.. Looks like most people are in a holding pattern until more information is available... Time for the next poll..

I don't understand why SageTV users would switch to WMC - it stopped being updated long before Google euthanized SageTV. Unless MS is saving a big MC reveal for RTM, I don't see anything that changes the equation from where it was in July 2011.

From the bottom of an article from Paul Thurrott http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/windows-8-consumer-preview-call-common-sense-142476:

No one uses or cares about Media Center except for you. This one is going to hurt, sorry. According to Microsoft, only a tiny, tiny percentage of Windows users have ever launched Windows Media Center, and of those, the vast majority were miss-clicks or one-time uses. And yet I get a lot of email about Media Center, so these few people obviously care quite a bit about this program the other 99 percent has been willfully ignoring for years.

Yes, Media Center is in the Windows 8 Consumer Preview. Yes, it's no different than the version in Windows 7. And yes, that's all the thought I care to give it. I know this is crazy, what with the "Future of Windows" stuff here, but I'm focusing on the new stuff, and, sorry, but the world has moved on: Most people now get TV and video entertainment services elsewhere. They will in Windows 8 too. Please. Stop asking.

I don't know if he's tied to Microsoft in an official capacity, but the Building Windows 8 twitter account (@BuildWindows8) linked to the article in their feed.  Bad news if it's true.

One reason I would move away from SageTV is no more free guide updates.

Another would be a need for additional clients or extenders.

When I setup my first real HTPC, I went directly to SageTV.  I never tried WMC, not sure I would stay with WMC either, might give Media Portal a try. 

For now all is working and no real complaints concerning SageTV.

 

 

I wouldn't consider any software that doesn't give me full use of my CableCARD.  Right now the only software that can give me full use of my CableCARD is WMC.  If not for this limitation, I probably wouldn't run WMC.

I also don't see any reason to upgrade in Windows 8.  From what I've read, WMC appears to be basically the same.  To get me to upgrade, there would have to be substantial improvements made to WMC.

Website design by Yammm Software
Powered by Drupal